Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Med Econ ; 16(5): 648-56, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23402559

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This time-and-motion study aimed to quantify healthcare personnel time associated with routine anemia-management tasks for maintenance therapy with C.E.R.A. (continuous erythropoietin receptor activator) that treats anemia with once-monthly injections versus other erythropoiesis-stimulating agents ('Other ESAs'), including shorter-acting ESAs (epoetin alfa, epeotin beta) and darbepoetin alfa. METHODS AND DESIGN: This was a non-interventional, observational study where patients were treated for anemia according to individual center practices. Time taken to complete frequent anemia-management tasks for both groups (C.E.R.A. vs. 'Other ESAs') was recorded and potential annual time savings per patient and per center following assumed 100% uptake of C.E.R.A. once monthly were estimated. RESULTS: For 'Other ESAs', the average total time spent per patient per year on frequent anemia management-related tasks ranged from 48 minutes in Spain to 265 minutes in Poland. For C.E.R.A. once monthly, the average total time spent per patient per year ranged from 12 minutes in Spain to 39 minutes in Poland, a reduction in actual time spent of 76-89% versus 'Other ESAs'. 100% adoption of C.E.R.A. once monthly may result in average annual time savings of 26-553 hours, a reduction of 67-95% depending on center size and frequency distribution of 'Other ESAs'. LIMITATIONS: Due to variability in treatment practices between centers (differences in task, description and frequency distribution of 'Other ESAs') and the small numbers of centers participating in each country, it is difficult to generalize annual per patient time results to reflect each country. Per center results should be interpreted with caution as they were derived based on specific center sizes that may not reflect typical center sizes in the country. CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of C.E.R.A. once monthly could offer substantial time savings on frequent anemia management-related tasks versus 'Other ESAs'; allowing re-allocation of scarce resources to other aspects of patient care.


Assuntos
Anemia/prevenção & controle , Eritropoetina/administração & dosagem , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hematínicos/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Diálise Renal/métodos , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Eritropoetina/uso terapêutico , Europa (Continente) , Hematínicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Estudos de Tempo e Movimento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA